Thread: Coronavirus
View Single Post
Old 08-01-2021, 16:32   #2696
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,408
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman View Post
Nothing wrong with paying a premium for the market leading product delivered earlier, in my view. Israel for example have done the same seeking to vaccinate all over 16s by April I think.

The question really is where the UK goes from here does it maintain it’s lead or does mass vaccination get bogged down in delivery problems, logistical challenges or random other delays. If so, running “into the lead” looks more a political stunt than a coherent vaccination strategy. As ever, the proof will be in the pudding.
Agreed. If it's a case of same product at the same time for a cheaper price then that's the value of the European scheme. If not then worth going direct and paying more.
1andrew1 is offline