Thread: Coronavirus
View Single Post
Old 19-12-2020, 17:42   #1729
mrmistoffelees
067
 
mrmistoffelees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middlesbrough
Age: 49
Services: Many
Posts: 5,034
mrmistoffelees has a nice shiny star
mrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny star
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien View Post
No. We said they couldn't break up the boroughs because of the transport links. London can be in whatever tier it needs to be but ALL of London has to be in it.

This is sensible for London though, if there has to be a tier 4 then London obviously has to be in it.
Apologies, you argued that because the average across all boroughs was low (despite two boroughs Havering & I can’t remember the other one having higher rates per 100,000 than tier 3 areas) that it shouldn’t be placed into tier 3

In retrospect would you still agree to that ?

Sensible, would have been to go into tier 3 instead of tier 2 your argument simply allowed London to become a Petri dish. And now the exodus will allow transmission across the country
__________________
Nerves of steel, heart of gold, knob of butter......
mrmistoffelees is offline