Anyway, we'll see. I don't care too much about the court cases because they'll work themselves out eventually either way.
There are more pressing questions though such as does Trump allow his White House to work with the transition team? At the moment that seems an open question.
https://apnews.com/article/election-...747fde8e01319c
---------- Post added at 22:40 ---------- Previous post was at 22:38 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by downquark1
No, "wide-spread fraud" is a red herring, it is not done that way because it is pointless in a electoral college system. You need only discount enough votes to swing battleground states. The fraud need only be from certain officials or even just ground level workers.
|
Has there ever been tens of thousands of ballots thrown out in US History? That would have to happen in multiple states and then the Democrats will be finding reasons to reject Republican votes too.
These cases would eventually end up in the Supreme Court.
Remember Flordia was less than 2,000 votes and look at the mess there. 10,000+ votes in multiple states. Don't see it.