Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
And that might help them in a close decision but these two justices are lifetime appointments now and I don't see them doing anything too outlandish.
The only way I see Trump overturning the election is via evidence of a wide-ranging and coordinated fraud at a federal level.
At the moment it seems like a pick and mix attempt to find problems with ballots in some of these close states to overturn enough until Trump can hit 270. He'll find problems, there always are, but coordinated fraud involving tens of thousands of ballots in multiple states is a harder task.
|
No, "wide-spread fraud" is a red herring, it is not done that way because it is pointless in a electoral college system. You need only discount enough votes to swing battleground states. The fraud need only be from certain officials or even just ground level workers.