Quote:
Originally Posted by downquark1
He won't concede if he thinks he can win in courts, that isn't how he crafts narratives. I guess it is up to state legalities if the counts get modified, but I don't think 2 states would be difficult if he can pull out overt recount descrepencies in both cases.
|
Well it couldn't be the two states for which there are recounts as that wouldn't be enough so he either needs a big state and one of those I mentioned or three states.
It would end up the Supreme Court and he would need large evidence of widespread fraud. The Supreme Court is, imo, not going to flip multiple states to change the winner of the election without something really, really big.
So yes if Trump has evidence the election was literally rigged then he might have a shot but if he is complaining about some of the process then nah.
---------- Post added at 17:38 ---------- Previous post was at 17:34 ----------
Just as an example the Trump campaign has had another press conference at 'Four Seasons Total Landscaping' (Trump originally said Four Seasons, Philadelphia so people assumed the hotel, not sure if it's a mistake and they got the wrong Four Seasons...) and again in response to requests for evidence they didn't provide any.
If you have it, show it and go to court. Otherwise you can't expect people to give it much attention and weight.