[nomadking]

Originally Posted by Sephiroth

No 4 in Andrew's list is due to social factors in that group rather than susceptibility.

That's my take from the 'Deprivation' aspect: https://assets.publishing.service.go...020_update.pdf

The 'Ethnicity' section of the above document is only able to report relative numbers, not causes.

For the scientific opinion: https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...67134820303385

Doesn't explain how men were twice as susceptible as women, across all racial groups. Everybody keep conveniently forgetting that.
Were the BAME groups more likely to get together in large gatherings? How many wedding parties with 100+ guests have been found out, and how many haven't? Those parties won't have come cheap(so much for the poverty claims).
It's been found even hospital staff were lacking in sticking to hygiene routines. Were the BAME groups generally less likely to stick to the enhanced hygiene routines?