Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
That was the only article at the time and people always want evidence when posting such information. I don't subscribe to The Times but the snippet told me enough.
|
But you mentioned 1 game attracted less than 1000 purchases, but no mention of that in the snippet.
---------- Post added at 21:02 ---------- Previous post was at 21:00 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
I’m not sure Sky/BT can reasonably argue it’s not the customer experience they are paying for.
My thought process is that the £80m is tiny compared to the billions they are paying for the 220 ordinarily televised games. I definitely think it creates a better value offering all round to have all games televised.
|
Of course they can, that is exactly what they did for the end of last season and received refunds.
They contracted to show games with crowds not empty cavernous stadia which is what they argued.
I agree it is not EPL fault but they gave refunds nonetheless.