Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
How is it reducing their existing costs if they're not actually feeding their children properly anyway?
|
1) are they not feeding their children 100% of the time?
2) Not 100% of those getting the help will be not feeding their children.
3) is there actually any genuine evidence that they are not feeding their children purely because of money. Or is it just evidence of chaotic parenting. There maybe examples involving drink and/or drugs, but the children should be removed from them. The extra money they get for the children is supporting their habit. You can't get addicted to drink, drugs, or nicotine without having the money to buy them in the first place.
Just another load of nonsense that seeks to just throws money at things, rather than address the true underlying problem(s).