Thread: Coronavirus
View Single Post
Old 23-10-2020, 19:13   #460
Hugh
laeva recumbens anguis
Cable Forum Team
 
Hugh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 68
Services: Premiere Collection
Posts: 43,758
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Hugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden auraHugh has a golden aura
Re: Coronavirus

Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf View Post
Mansplaining (a blend word of man and the informal form splaining of the gerund explaining) is a pejorative term meaning "(of a man) to comment on or explain something to a woman in a condescending, overconfident, and often inaccurate or oversimplified manner".[1][2][3][4] Author Rebecca Solnit ascribed the phenomenon to a combination of "overconfidence and cluelessness".[5] Lily Rothman, of The Atlantic, defined it as "explaining without regard to the fact that the explainee knows more than the explainer, often done by a man to a woman".[6]

In its original use, mansplaining differed from other forms of condescension in that it was said to be rooted in the assumption that a man is likely to be more knowledgeable than a woman.[7] However, it has come to be used more broadly, often applied when a man takes a condescending tone in an explanation to anyone, regardless of the age or gender of the intended recipients: a "man 'splaining" can be delivered to any audience.[2] In 2010, it was named by the New York Times as one of its "Words of the Year".[8] American Dialect Society nominated Mansplaining as the “most creative” new word in 2012.[9]
Slight problem with your highlighted part of the definition - [2] references the Merriam-Webster Dictionary definition, which doesn’t have the highlighted part in it...

https://www.merriam-webster.com/word...nition-history

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/mansplaining

The only references in Google to the highlighted part of your post are in Wikipedia (which appears to be incorrect, as the referenced article doesn’t have those words in it), and a couple of articles that reference the Wikipedia article.

Hope this helps...

But in response to what I think was your point, my comment was not intended to be "condescending" - if it was, my apologies to heero.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg 8CEF7FAE-EE24-4104-BBD3-FB7F5C45AB2B.jpeg (410.8 KB, 12 views)
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.

If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.

Last edited by Hugh; 25-10-2020 at 13:26.
Hugh is offline