Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr K
It's because we weren't draconian enough and relaxed restrictions too soon that this has come back. Open pubs, restaurants, send kids back to school/uni, encourage everyone back to work, and hey presto, guess what happened next ?
|
What happened? People got infected, we don’t know if the amount of people infected was more or less than the initial wave.
---------- Post added at 21:33 ---------- Previous post was at 21:27 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
You’re wasting your breath it doesn’t matter what the evidence says some are firmly in the letting old/vulnerable die is a price worth laying for a few points on the stock exchange.
|
Are more dying? Demonstrably so? Also, it’s not about the stock Exchange ( funny how that’s your first thought) it’s about life, and getting on with it.
Quote:
In fairness to Pierre he came back straight away in support of working from home, even post covid, as more sustainable in the future.
|
Absolutely, I do endeavour to be consistent, there is no excuse not to be allowed to work from home if you can, and if you want. As long as performance is not impacted (and that should be easily measured)
It cuts travel costs, building costs, it empowers employees to manage their time and their home/work balance. Done correctly there are no downsides.