Quote:
Originally Posted by jonbxx
To be fair, I wasn't even aware of this case until today so I was unable to express any outrage. I agree that the German courts vs. the ECJ could result in Germany being in a position to break the Eurozone agreements. Luckily for everyone, the further clarifications sent by the ECB were accepted by German as passing the subsidiarity tests they initially failed and a bullet was dodged. The UK can still dodge a bullet too...
Luckily in terms of corruption, the EU and Western Europe states are the least corrupt region in the world with 14 of the top 20 countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index. Always room for improvement though - https://www.transparency.org/en/news...-europe-and-eu |
I do not want the UK to dodge a bullet, I do not care if it means breaching international law, it if means stopping the corrupted EU from getting it's grips on Northern Ireland.
The EU is corrupt to the core and nothing you say changes this or any stupid index system. I have a pair of eyes, it is corrupt!
The EU pretends to be a Democratic Entity = Corrupt.
Just look at the European Commission Presidential Election last year, how the current and new president, Ursula Von Der Leyen, wasn't even on the ballot = Corrupt.
It breaches International law itself, is in current breach of the Withdrawal Act, given it is not acting in good faith in negotiations when it has a legal requirement to do so. A legal standard itself upholds with but fails to follow itself = Corrupt.
The EU insists that Democratic processes are asked again, to ensure it gets the result it wants = Corrupt.
Thankfully the UK stood up to this totally corrupted democratic system by a totally corrupted entity.
I will keep on saying it until you and the other Remainers in this thread get it. Germany broke international law, "broke" is past tense, it does not say in the article, that it was going to break, it "broke" it cannot undo what it has done, so as the Spectator asked in the article, why was Germany not punished by the corrupted EU for breaking International law, stop trying to sugar coat it or pretend it didn't happen when it did.
When a legal expert, a barrister has certainly explained in the Spectator that the case was that Germany, with its supposed high commitment to international law, found as a matter of principle that it can overturn international law (this can only mean break it), if an international law obligation asked Germany to do something which was a fundamental breach of its constitution.
---------- Post added at 19:01 ---------- Previous post was at 18:52 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1
And more importantly, to distract from the Track and Trace failings.
|
That is what the pathetic EU's Barnier accused him off yesterday. Mouth piece for the EU yet again I see, you're a disgrace Andrew.
