Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
The IRA still being supported, armed, and active, breaks the GFA. The constant threats of ending the "peace process" also breaks the GFA, and prevents any decision taken as being invalid, as it's under duress. What other situation would a decision be valid when made under the threat of violence?
The bill DOESN'T mean a hard border UNLESS the EU wants it that way. The CURRENT NI protocol allows for it to be stopped sometime in the future anyway.
|
It's the WTO who would insist upon a hard border. And which trading block would be most capable of resisting the WTO:
a) A 27-nation trading bloc with trade deals in place with all major trading blocs and countries in the World?
b) A country with a couple of trade deals in place which has recently admitted the bill being debated in Parliament right now breaks international law?