Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Not from you...
Peer-reviewed papers are "evidence", which this is not - it’s one Prof of Stats views, not backed up by any other papers/research.
From the Bristol Uni web-page
I guess it's 'evidence' if it says what you want it to say... |
I think you are stretching it, Hugh. Ok, it's a theory, but it is still evidence to support what I was saying.
True, the two articles that were produced did not come from me because someone beat me to it, but it was the second of those articles I was referring to in my original post.