Thread: Coronavirus (OLD)
View Single Post
Old 10-09-2020, 09:08   #5411
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,255
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
And when asked politely for a link to back up this assertion, failed to provide one.

Also, you stated previously on the 5th that scientists had said that the delay in lockdown made no difference in the impact of the virus, and there would be no 2nd wave - when asked for a link, once again none was forthcoming...
I'll try and help move this debate forwards. My understanding is that no one on the forum has found any scientists supporting Old Boy's assertion and the OP appears not to have done so yet either.

However, Julian did kindly unearth a maths professor in Bristol whose model suggested Britain's infection rate peaked on 18th March which the Daily Mail said threw into question whether Britain's lockdown on 23rd March was necessary.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-lockdown.html
Last edited by 1andrew1; 10-09-2020 at 09:13.
1andrew1 is online now