|
Re: Brexit-Transitional Period Ends 31/12/20
Quote:
Originally Posted by jonbxx
The ECJ can only rule over areas where EU directives and regulations are in force so, if we want to have access to EU (and some non-EU) agencies, there is a case for 'sucking it up' and taking ECJ jurisdiction to get access.
My wish list would include;
EASA - aviation regulation including safety and the European Common Aviation Area
ECHA - chemical regulation and safety including REACH (huge impact to my business right now!)
EMA - European Medicines Agency
EUIPO - intellectual property
EFSA - food safety
EMSA - maritime safety
ECDC - disease control and epidemiology
Leaving these agencies due to ECJ jurisdiction in a quest for sovereignty seems to be the aim. It's each persons own value judgement to what cost is worth the degree of sovereignty we will gain.
|
Do you think it is right that that the EU should insist on ECJ jurisdiction over elements over a trade deal when that is not the case with Canada and Japan?
__________________
Seph.
My advice is at your risk.
Last edited by Sephiroth; 10-08-2020 at 11:46.
|