Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
I definitely think there’s a public interest in the name not being published for the sake of due process, for the victim and the accused.
It won’t take a rocket scientist much time to identify the accuser who then lives the next weeks and months in fear of harassment. The accused is entitled to a fair trial. It does appear to put the Party in a slightly awkward position, however the fairness of the police investigation has to come first.
I would hope the Party would be consistent on that though, regardless of whether they are a traitorous remainer or a patriotic Brexiteer.
|
The media will already know who he is but won't dare go there and name him, newspapers may have argued public interest, but their lawyers will remind them of the recent aforementioned case law, involving Cliff Richard, he won his battle and both BBC and the Police were ordered to hand over £200,000 each to Cliff Richard for damages.