Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushan
Please link me to a post where I've said any of what you've claimed.
Besides, as others have pointed out, there's a huge difference. Obama was clear and up front about what he wanted. He wasn't funnelling dirty money through back channels or propping up people to do his dirty work.
The issue, as I keep repeating, isn't about if, it's about why. You keep ignoring that point.
Good question, if only we'd investigated then we'd know.
Zero evidence because we didn't investigate it. Again, I'm imploring you to ask why we didn't investigate it.
Always with the why.
|
Because it’s pointless, even if Russia interfered, like they did in Scottish Referendum, no doubt they were trying to influence a Independent Scotland, they clearly failed in that aspect. But the only reason you want it investigating is to claim, like some already are, that it was a fraudulent result when it clearly was not.