View Single Post
Old 22-07-2020, 09:15   #96
nomadking
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb, V6 STB
Posts: 8,152
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
Re: Was Labour complicit with Russian interference in 2019 UK General Election?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr K View Post
Powerful people can always get their names suppressed.

The fact the Govt. are dismissing this report already makes them complicit Russia's interference. Trouble is the Russians now have carte blanche to interfere where the Govt don't want.

What sanctions are we going to take ? Yet another country we can't/won't trade with ? We're now even a tinier fish in a massive sea, with no influence but weak to influence from others. Our World super power days are long gone, the only power we did have was that we were part of the largest trading bloc in the World, no more.
What has getting "names suppressed" got to do with it. All I'm asking for, is examples of the supposed actual actions of Mr X, Mr Y, Mr Z, etc. How can anybody be expected to investigate or comment on actions that nobody seems to be aware of. Eg If you've been burgled, you may not know who by, but you will see the disturbance and the missing items. If you went and said X burgled somebody, then it's not unreasonable to ask the when, where, and what in relation to it. If there is nothing missing and no signs of a disturbance, it's not unreasonable to say that the allegations against X are spurious and without foundation.
nomadking is offline   Reply With Quote