Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
Yes because voters can decide for themselves.
Boris Johnson making a speech saying Starmer is incompetent would be different to him, theoretically, organising a lot of fake stories from his time in the CPS calling him incompetent. And it CERTAINLY would be different to him hacking the Labour Party.
This are all worse things.
|
So when were Labour hacked and how would it be different to any other hacking attempt on the rest of us? If they did and succeeded, how would that influence anything. If they uncovered bad secrets, then shouldn't those bad secrets be exposed to the electorate, so "voters can decide for themselves"?
Still not seeing any of a little thing called evidence, that anybody did anything. If there was a "something" then it could be considered and looked into. The best they can come up with is, "Russia might have wanted to influence X, Y, Z". Same could be said about the US, Germany, France, Ireland etc.
You can't influence anybody without somehow people being
openly exposed to that influence.