View Single Post
Old 21-07-2020, 19:36   #80
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,306
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Was Labour complicit with Russian interference in 2019 UK General Election?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kushan View Post
We could ask our intelligence agencies if Russia interfered. Crazy thought, I know.
If the Government knew Russia hadn't interfered, then it would be quite keen to ask this question. If a government of leavers felt there was a chance Russia had interfered, would it feel so comfortable in asking the question?

---------- Post added at 19:36 ---------- Previous post was at 19:35 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien View Post
There is a difference between someone saying something up-front for which people can make their own judgements and people interfering behind the scenes and possibly committing criminal acts such as hacking.

You're not inferring if you express an opinion, you are if you're engaging in hacking attacks or bombarding the internet with bots.
Exactly - totally false equivalents.
1andrew1 is online now   Reply With Quote