View Single Post
Old 21-07-2020, 10:43   #45
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,305
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Was Labour complicit with Russian interference in 2019 UK General Election?

Report here. https://docs.google.com/a/independen...EyN2Y3NjM0OWFl

---------- Post added at 10:43 ---------- Previous post was at 10:41 ----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking View Post
Documents are leaked all the time. Any misrepresentation of the contents was purely down to Labour and the media, which allowed them to get away with it. I remember an instance a long time go(pre 1997), where a civil service report on options on a subject was leaked. Labour and the media jumped on it, claiming it was Government plans, when at that point nobody in Government had seen it, and if they had, it was just options, not intentions. It turned out that one of the people involved in the report was somebody who was a Labour party candidate.


The central problem isn't so much leaking of documents, but the misrepresentation of the contents.
I'm afraid that I think you're rather too forgiving of foreign powers.
1andrew1 is offline   Reply With Quote