Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
Listen, I don’t know what your profession is, if indeed you have one, but I am an incorporated Engineer that has worked in the transmission and fibre engineering sector for a long time. If I was lying the mods on here Could easily ascertain my identity and do a quick LinkedIn search and call me out, but they won’t because I’m not
I don’t have to certify my credentials to you.
It’s not, Hibernia Atlantic announced to the world they were going to build a new a trans-Atlantic cable that would be partially funded By Huawei and using Huawei equipment.
They were refused permission to build that system by the US government, and instead had to find alternative funding and use US supplier TESubcom, it put the project back years.
The risks were highlighted and continued to be closely monitored, hence the course of action taken.
Because I am clearly debating with one, or someone with the mental capacity of one.
https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.ph...dband-kit.html
Not Huawei but another Chinese vendor, like Huawei, ZTE etc. They are ultimately Chinese state owned, there are no private companies in China. |
You have no right to know me, nor my occupation, however if you claim to use your “expertise” in commenting on a sector it may be helpful if you offered an evidence base. Which in your original post you did not.
If/when Biden wins I’ll be genuinely intrigued to read your climb down.
---------- Post added at 20:45 ---------- Previous post was at 20:40 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
I have to prove nothing
|
Such extraordinary, although not unexpected, arrogance.
---------- Post added at 20:51 ---------- Previous post was at 20:45 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
Engineer is not manual labour, it is a skilled technical position in Telecomms.
Before retiring, I worked at a number of Universities, and used to attend RUGIT (Russell Group IT Directors Group) meetings, and we often had "off agenda" briefings from representatives from the National Cyber Security Centre (which is part of GCHQ) - there were often warnings about how Chinese students were actively copying/taking back to China proprietary research findings, and how we should be mitigating this (difficult in Universities, who believe knowledge should be shared), and how they had concerns about any Chinese manufacturers tech being embedded in our networks (pro’s were it was cheaper, con’s were it was often built with stolen copyrighted technologies, and concerns about backdoor security potential breaches).
|
Grateful if Pierre could present such credentials, although equally indifferent if he/she could not.