[Sephiroth]

Originally Posted by nomadking

If you're going to criticise the "colonial powers", then you MUST criticise those who not only at the SAME time, but BEFORE and AFTER, actually facilitated all of it. Without those Black African others, the "colonial powers" would never been involved in any way. It wouldn't have even occurred to them. The "colonial powers" DIDN'T enslave them, Black Africans did. Perhaps all that should be taught as part of Black history.

... not to mention the Arabs who don't give a fig about anyone else, especially infidels.

ianch is so damn woke that he can't take a common sense view. The past is the past and it is the present and future that matters.

Btw, just to put the proverbial spanner into ianch's works, places like Zimbabwe, dare I say, Kenya, Rwanda and similar ilk would thrive if they were under benevolent British administration. Of course they wouldn't stand for it - the leaders would be deprived of their corrupt gains.

In ianch's world, all statues of people deemed to have been connected with past practices that are deprecated by the woke lot, will be torn down; the Queen's head would have to come off stamps because here grandfather was an arch colonialist.

We have bigger problems to face like how long it will take at present ethnic birth rates before we all have to face east. Start worrying.

https://tribune.com.pk/story/1665803...ports-guardian

According to Bullivant, many young Europeans “will have been baptised and then never darken the door of a church again. Cultural religious identities just aren’t being passed on from parents to children. It just washes straight off them.”

The figures for the UK were partly explained by high immigration, he added. “One in five Catholics in the UK were not born in the UK.

“And we know the Muslim birthrate is higher than the general population, and they have much higher [religious] retention rates.”