Quote:
Originally Posted by downquark1
They think that the BBC's constitutional obligation to host him is an endorsement.
|
There's no constitutional need to have someone from an obscure party with no MPs on speed dial last time I checked. But I digress.
---------- Post added at 21:44 ---------- Previous post was at 21:37 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
So if I, for example, had an opinion as a white middle aged male, a considered and objective opinion on the matter. That did not fit with the BLM narrative. Then I could express that, no problem, I wouldn’t be attacked, I would be listened to, objectively, and if and were appropriate challenged in a non-violent and threatening way?
|
I can imagine some people being a bit flaky and not expressing their views openly but I can't see you being one of them.
