Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
1) Delusional to say bad behaviour isn't the main factor. If the "poor" behave well, nobody will really notice any effect.
2) Fact of life, that "doing well" means moving away from a "poor" area. Same all around the World.
3) Nice areas become more expensive to live in. If the area becomes "nicer", that must be because the "not nice" people have moved out. Harlem was "nice" until "we're not allowed to say" happened.
4) Control aka Power.
|
1)"Bad" behaviour doesn't always mean the same. It could just be having more cars, or less nice cars or driving a motor scooter.
2)Yes fact of life but if they want to improve their area they may need to stay and build up the area from the inside. Make the improvement "organic"
3)Again true but ideally it should happen more slowly and allow the current residents to also build up. The problems really happen when the richer buy don't really move in. Either they buy to rent/holiday home or they use as dorm but spend outside the area.
4)Yup, there are those who do very nicely from poverty. And this is where it can really butt up to the BLM debate. It's unfortunately true that many of these are black and so are their victims (who may have to work for them). If that's true it means the police intelligence will show this and likely target black people because there is a higher chance of a "successful" stop.