Quote:
Originally Posted by tweetiepooh
It's still all a heart issue and that's hard to change (impossible) to do just with external changes though improving the external should still happen.
But I was thinking about social and locality and
1)Richer areas until poor families (are) settle(d) there. Then the middle class move out taking the wealth with them - race can be a factor but can just be not like us. It's harder to pull up and pull down. It doesn't even have to be bad behaviour, if say the new comers run a business from the home or other things that "disrupt".
2)Poor areas regardless of race -we encourage kids to do well so they can improve themselves, get educated, get a good job - all good but then in many cases they move out of the area.
3)In some cases wealthier people see "opportunity" in poorer areas, move in, spend money "gentrify" the area and make it more expensive so poorer people may need to move out
4)There are some in the poorer areas who don't want to see the area progress as they lose their control
|
1) Delusional to say bad behaviour isn't the main factor. If the "poor" behave well, nobody will really notice any effect.
2) Fact of life, that "doing well" means moving away from a "poor" area. Same all around the World.
3) Nice areas become more expensive to live in. If the area becomes "nicer", that must be because the "not nice" people have moved out. Harlem was "nice" until "we're not allowed to say" happened.
4) Control aka Power.