Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456
One would assume it was either the modelling group it was submitted to or SAGE and any decision to exclude would have been by peer review.
|
One would assume... yes.
Would be interesting to see that confirmed. Also what were the specialist areas of the respective people on opposing positions. Who was setting agendas for any meeting and was there an overarching “steer”. One only has to set a series of working assumptions to change the outputs significantly.
One would hope not. As I say, it’d be interesting. If the process has failed then perhaps it needs redesigned for future emergencies.