Thread: Coronavirus (OLD)
View Single Post
Old 10-06-2020, 21:11   #3915
1andrew1
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,410
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze1andrew1 is cast in bronze
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman View Post
It’s only truly hindsight if there was no alternative opinions available at the time. Something/someone (or multiple people) contributed to our decision making processes at many points against alternative scientific opinion - I’m curious as to the evidence base.

If we are listening to crap scientists then I hope we aren’t listening to them now. If it’s crap politicians the same.
This is pertinent and interesting, from Hayley Barlow, Channel 4's Director of Communications
Quote:
EXCL: Channel 4 News has seen a leaked paper prepared for one of the scientific committees advising the government - which called in the starkest possible way for a lockdown - a full two weeks before the official announcement was made.
https://twitter.com/Hayley_Barlow/st...78122040942597
1andrew1 is offline