Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
Which is good of him to do so but your attacking me on something from events from yesterday. Yesterday it was conjecture. Today he's admitted it, be fair. 
Simples - For exercise, which is allowed.
No rules broken, no laws broken. This should be the end of it. |
I’m not attacking you at all far from it. If you’ve read previous posts I’ve agreed with you on the trial by media and also that at the time he moved his wife and children there had been amendments to the regulations that allowed this.
Nope, the official guidelines were to leave your home to exercise once a day and not to travel/drive to take exercise, this was at the time he made his journey.
The eyesight excuse is precisely that an excuse. He broke the rules. End of
---------- Post added at 17:49 ---------- Previous post was at 17:45 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien
I wonder why he didn't say the test drive was to test his stamina rather than eyesight? Seems a bit silly to load the family into the car to do that.
|
Yes, especially as the majority of the routes from Durham to Barnard Castle are quite twisty and narrow. Great fun on a motorbike not necessarily so much fun or safe if you need to test your eyesight
---------- Post added at 17:51 ---------- Previous post was at 17:49 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
They really are hounding slags.
Will they apologise to him of they find nothing? Hypocritically no, I am sure.
|
Oh be quiet, had this been a special advisor to labour or the Lib Dem’s you would more than likely be egging the press on and be baying for blood