Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
Yes and we all know why you think he is automatically guilty don't we?
He broke no rules because he was safeguarding his son - thus, he did nothing wrong.
It's none of your business who he chose to look after his son. That decision is his and not yours, how dare you decide who should look after his son, mind your own business. You would not tolerate somebody dictating to you what to do with your family, so do not tell others what or how they should manage with theirs when you do not know of their personal circumstances, in particular the childs health.
---------- Post added at 14:50 ---------- Previous post was at 14:49 ----------
Exactly OB - some people need to open their bloody eyes FFS.  |
Think you've hit the nail on the head there Mick. Most of us have been tolerating someone dictating to us what we can and more importantly can not do with our family. Hence the (deserved) outcry when someone who should make sure their actions means they are above criticism seems to come across with an almost arrogant contempt for the rest of us. You can spin it as much as you want but the Government are now fighting a loosing case in the court of public opinion.