Quote:
Originally Posted by ianch99
He broke the rules. Sorry, he broke his rules. These are here for reference (published 12 March 2020).
He and you have a strange definition of "safeguarding": putting your child in a metal box for 4 hours with someone who has a deadly disease, for most people, does not make the grade.
The other bizarre thing here is that Cummings has the resources of the Government at his disposal. He could have asked for childcare to be arranged and it would have been done instantly. In fact, the mother of the child in question has a sister living 2 streets away apparently.
You are seemingly so angry not because he is innocent but, exactly as you reveal, he is the High Priest of Brexit .. |
Yes and we all know why you think he is automatically guilty don't we?
He broke no rules because he was safeguarding his son - thus, he did nothing wrong.
It's none of your business who he chose to look after his son. That decision is his and not yours, how dare you decide who should look after his son, mind your own business. You would not tolerate somebody dictating to you what to do with your family, so do not tell others what or how they should manage with theirs when you do not know of their personal circumstances, in particular the childs health.
---------- Post added at 14:50 ---------- Previous post was at 14:49 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
The regulations state:
You should stay at home as much as possible. The reasons you may leave home include:
for work, where you cannot work from homegoing to shops that are permitted to be open - to get things like food and medicine, to exercise or spend time outdoors, any medical need, including to donate blood, avoid injury or illness, escape risk of harm, or to provide care or to help a vulnerable person.
|
Exactly OB - some people need to open their bloody eyes FFS.
