Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
Yes it is a shame really people like you, have got this wrong, when no rules were broken. The safeguarding of the child came first and was the necessity. The second trip being suggested is conjecture no doubt by activists. "I saw a man that looked like Cummings."
Means Jack shit. Pathetic.  |
I'm not convinced no rules were broken. It's a police matter and I'm happy to leave it up to them.
You do realise the police investigate witness statements all the time - it's a staple of any criminal investigation and then they go on to corroborate the whereabouts of the person who 'may have been seen'. I don't know why you find it so objectionable - I get that you feel you have to defend him at at all costs but is he always above criticism?
It's unhealthy to beatify politicians and their advisers in such a manner.
---------- Post added at 12:33 ---------- Previous post was at 12:30 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by papa smurf
He hasn't gone anywhere the talent is still in da house.
|
For now. There comes a point where that's untenable if the story goes on for much longer. 20 MPs are just those above the parapet.