Quote:
Originally Posted by Mythica
|
That does not tell you who owns it.
---------- Post added at 19:14 ---------- Previous post was at 19:10 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh
If one Googles "Dominic Cummings car", and click on "images", this is the fourth (at this time) image that is displayed.
|
What is the Reg then? Because if you can read it off that photo, you are very talented.
---------- Post added at 19:23 ---------- Previous post was at 19:14 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees
Show me where I said he’s categorically guilty ?
Let’s deal with the facts.
A city of eight million people and he was unable to get childcare ? Did he NEED to travel to get childcare? I highly doubt it
|
You nor I know his personal situation or the support network around him so any conclusion is speculation and not a fact.
Quote:
|
He then drives 260 miles across the country to stay at a residence (which he openly admits he then didn’t use)
|
Did he stay in a separate building or annex? If so what is the issue?
Quote:
|
He’s then allegedly spotted travelling between London and Durham on a further two occasions. (Of course we need evidence to prove him guilty) but you cannot dismiss eyewitness accounts out of hand surely they require investigation?
|
Allegedly, And corroborated, so not a fact
Quote:
|
We have the police who are saying that they did speak to the family regarding his stay in Durham, the transport secretary says the police didn’t. Someone is lying and I doubt it’s Durham police.
|
They spoke to his father, well actually his father spoke to them. The police did not visit the property.
Quote:
|
There’s more than a whiff of a cover up and it requires further investigation to confirm or deny the supporting (or lack thereof) evidence
|
Opinion not fact.
I looked at your facts and found them to be not facts.