Quote:
Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees
Show me where I said he’s categorically guilty ?
Let’s deal with the facts.
A city of eight million people and he was unable to get childcare ? Did he NEED to travel to get childcare? I highly doubt it
He then drives 260 miles across the country to stay at a residence (which he openly admits he then didn’t use)
He’s then allegedly spotted travelling between London and Durham on a further two occasions. (Of course we need evidence to prove him guilty) but you cannot dismiss eyewitness accounts out of hand surely they require investigation?
We have the police who are saying that they did speak to the family regarding his stay in Durham, the transport secretary says the police didn’t. Someone is lying and I doubt it’s Durham police.
There’s more than a whiff of a cover up and it requires further investigation to confirm or deny the supporting (or lack thereof) evidence
|
First part of your point, yes he clearly did, it is irrelevant how many people live in one city like London, if you have kids you don't just entrust them to anybody. What he did, that is not against the law. Safeguarding of a young child took priority.
All the other points you raise are conjecture. Allegedly this, one witness saw that, where are the photos, where is the video evidence?
I can say I saw Elton John walking down my road yesterday, saying it and proving it, are two different things.
They saw sweet FA because it's bullshit.
I am still waiting for you to prove his guilt, not spin the media mantra which is most certainly not evidence of any guilt whatsoever!
As I said innocent until proven guilty exists for a reason. We do not do trial by media in this country and it's utterly sad how people follow the news like lost sheep.