Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
You don’t need government for that.
You lack vision, something most entrepreneurs and successful business owners should have. I’m sure those that can, are putting measures in place. Obviously not all can.
no, they had massive issues, including supply chain of other firms. But construction was never mandated to close. So if they did suddenly they were issued with breach of contract orders, so they had to get back to work, and as I’m sure are aware there is no sector more focused on H&S than the construction industry. So before they started up a lot of work went into how they could do it safely.
and I would not expect them to, but I would expect them to be using all their efforts to explore how they can operate safely and unfurlough their employees ASAP.
---------- Post added at 23:19 ---------- Previous post was at 23:19 ----------
Nothing.
|
I fail to see how I can reasonably be accused of lacking vision when I’ve correctly identified a number of variables for any successful risk assessment.
There’s no obligation to try to unfurlough workers as soon as possible - that’s simply your personal preference in the matter principally because of your political ideology. For some businesses opening up will remain not commercially viable for the foreseeable - in these cases unfurloughing staff “ASAP” as you put it would make no commercial sense and actually would leave some company officers in breach of their legal obligations in respect of foregoing Government assistance and incurring needless losses.
Great business owners and entrepreneurs know state hand outs are a great idea instead of them taking losses themselves.
I think you lack vision in this regard.