|
Re: Coronavirus
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter
'People aged over 50 should remain under lockdown for longer than younger Brits and fined if they can't prove their age when they are out, experts claim.
Researchers at the University of Warwick believe a "rolling age-release strategy" to let younger people out earlier combined with social distancing is the safest way out of the UK's lockdown':
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/115138...gn=sharebarweb |
Here’s the summary(without the Sun’s inflammatory interpretation), and the actual paper.
https://warwick.ac.uk/newsandevents/..._young_adults/
https://www.andrewoswald.com/docs/ne...vee2020(1).pdf
Not all 20-30 year olds...
Quote:
To minimize that risk, we could restrict the release to those young people who do not live with parents. Those released would presumably also have to give a strict undertaking, upheld by the law, that they would avoid all other older adults...
... Therefore, of the 20-30 years old, 7,836,394 x 0.47 = 3,683,105 lived with parents in 2018. Hence 4,175,428 were not living with parents in 2018.
|
So nearly half of all 20-30 year olds couldn’t go out, while their friends could.
Yeh, I can see that working...
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Last edited by Hugh; 01-05-2020 at 21:08.
|