Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
Err, nope...I didn’t even consider the cost of anything. Just on the practicality of it, it is not possible to be 100% , which is what believe “totally” means. So no you’re wrong in trying to transpose what you think into what I posted.
. 100% ? Totally contain it? ...................with 0% risk to anyone?
|
Then you are just plain wrong then.
Quote:
|
I don’t need to see scientific evidence to know that is highly unlikely if not impossible.
|
You don’t need scientific evidence?
What else should we rely on? Gut instinct? If I’m certain of anything it’s that Coronavirus won’t be resolved, or the economy recover, by ignoring scientific evidence.
Although it’s nice to see you roll back your opinion to “unlikely”.
Quote:
Ok junior virologist, if you can guarantee 0% risk of infection in that scenario, I’ll jump on board with you...............can you?
|
No need for insults so I’m not going to rise to the bait. These are scientifically proven techniques for controlling virus spread.