Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
Of course there will be a smaller number if kids that attend these venues, however the numbers of children actually in contact with each would be around the same as a normal class size ( anywhere between 15-30) and many many smaller but numerous < 15 operating all over.
It’s as much a risk as a school and vice versa.
|
Not a high school, two in my town have over a thousand pupils all changing classrooms every hour, intervals, lunchtimes, buses to and from.
Quote:
|
so would a school? The pupils are all known, easily traced and isolated?
|
As above.
Quote:
|
my point was about specific skills, what if known are available? what if, as discussed, there is non-available as it is closed but they’ve been told they can operate, and therefore will no longer be able to claim government assistance.....just go out of business then?
|
What would they do if said person got hit by a bus tomorrow? It doesn't sound like good business continuity planning for one person to be mission critical.
Quote:
Wow, at last.........an admission from you that government cannot do all or be responsible for all.
You’re on the right path now, keep walking.
|
You've completely misunderstood my point, potentially wilfully for the purposes of being obtuse.
The Government can take responsibility for the people, businesses and underlying economy. It cannot simply create a set of rules for everyone, in every set of circumstances, to carry on working safely as if there's no global pandemic on the go.
I have no need to keep walking anywhere. My point has been entirely consistent throughout.
I fail to see why you are spending your time asking me to provide solutions for things I don't think should be happening in the short term in any case. The "open the economy" side must really be scraping the bottom of the barrell if I've to provide the informed arguments for and against.