22-04-2020, 11:03
|
#2414
|
cf.mega poster
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 15,249
|
Re: Coronavirus
Roche has released its results today and in amongst them are some interesting comments
Confirmation that our testing infrastructure is below those of the better countries but is improving:
Quote:
Roche’s chief executive has said the UK has not invested enough in healthcare and testing infrastructure in recent years — leaving it to lag behind other countries and hindering its response to coronavirus. The Swiss company is one of the diagnostics “big four”, providing molecular tests that look for the presence of the virus using so-called “high throughput” machines, which can process many tests in short amounts of time. “You cannot just start a lab on a greenfield,” Severin Schwan, Roche’s chief executive, said on Wednesday, as he gave a first-quarter trading update.“One of the learnings of this crisis is you see some of the countries who have invested in healthcare, in testing infrastructure over the last [few] years, such as certain countries in Asia, [like] Singapore, or, say, South Korea. Or, if you look in Europe: Germany, Switzerland,” he said. “Those countries now have a huge advantage.” “And then you have other countries who under-invested in healthcare infrastructure, but now it shows,” he said.“There are certain regions in the UK where there is no single high throughput platform,” Mr Schwan went on to say. “In Switzerland, there are 20.”
|
But things are now improving in the UK
Quote:
Roche said bottlenecks in testing were down to the lack of infrastructure, rather than a lack of tests, but noted that the UK had made advances in the past few weeks. There has been a “lot of co-operation with authorities, so they should get some credit for what they’ve done”, said Mr Schwan.“The UK and other governments are under enormous pressure,” he said. “To a certain degree nobody could really foresee that and they’re really working hard.”He added Roche was installing new testing infrastructure in the UK and that this “was only possible” because the government supported it.
|
https://www.ft.com/content/9e3dfb65-...8-a26613ac2c79
---------- Post added at 11:03 ---------- Previous post was at 11:02 ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadking
So no advantage whatsoever in being part of an EU scheme that would control and limit allocation anyway.  So what is all the fuss and nonsense about?
|
People dying through lack of PPE is not fuss and nonsense in most people's eyes.
|
|
|