Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
Even though you are CableForums most eminent chief virologist, the correct answer I think would be, we don’t know.
Unless you’ve done the research, of course.
|
No need, once again, for your childish insults. When was the last time we had a global pandemic on this scale?
It’s far from a regular occurrence. Therefore it can, to a person of reasonably average intelligence, be described as extremely unlikely for further deadly strains to develop in five of the next ten years.
Quote:
|
Absolutely, I think a national store of PPE is required, depends on the shelf life as to how much we can stockpile.
|
If we can maintain nuclear weapons never used I’m sure PPE is achievable.
Quote:
Yes a “mechanism” - don’t know what it is, but we should have it.
Proven not to be effective during this pandemic.
https://www.eurosurveillance.org/con...0.25.5.2000080
I’m going to downgrade you to “junior virologist” for this error.
isolate them based on airport screening that is too inaccurate?
it certainly isn’t, it’s infectious disease management, when you don’t know the disease and you don’t know how infectious it is, you don’t know the mortality rate, you don’t know how if affects each individual............in short you know sweet FA about anything and you have to make decisions everyday based on the data of the previous day.
|
Yet other countries are doing these things and finding success. One internet story does not evidence make.
Airport screening may not get everyone, but as I’m sure you’ve observed more people out there with the virus = greater spread.
As you’ve selectively quoted my post to make fairly inaccurate analysis I’m going to upgrade you to “junior pedant”.