Quote:
Originally Posted by pip08456
Big post containing nothing relative to the point.
Where in the above waffle does it refute the claim that
|
Erm, that's not what I posted - I posted
Quote:
The changes that were introduced by the Conservative Government of the day, when the Justice Department was lead by Chris Grayling?
Wonder why they don’t want an apology from him, or from Dame Alison Saunders, who was the DPP when the investigation into Paul Gambaccini was undertaken?
Or perhaps Bernard Hogan-Howe, who was the Met Police Commissioner at the time - it was his officers who interviewed Mr Gambaccini.
|
You asked for links, and I supplied them.
The changes were also agreed by Chris Grayling, who was the Justice Secretary at the time - so if an apology is requred from Starmer, shouldn't it also be required from Grayling?
The recommendations were a lot more complex than
Quote:
|
effectively urged police to believe the accuser
|
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24555303
Quote:
Under the guidelines, prosecutors are told to focus on the credibility of allegations, not on whether victims make good witnesses.
All suspects will also be investigated to see if they possess indecent images.
The guidelines cover how victims should be treated and how a case should be built and presented in court.
|
Quote:
|
A joint protocol for information sharing in child sexual abuse cases has also been published alongside the guidelines, in which police and prosecutors are expected to share information with social services, schools and family courts.
|
The Met Police launched Operation Midland, not the CPS.