Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick
Actually, I disagree, Stephen Kinnock did nothing wrong, he gave supplies to a vulnerable group of people, which is allowed, albeit they were his parents. He complied with social distancing when he was there and kept apart from them at all times.
He did nothing wrong but the police did with their smart arse reply to him on his twitter feed, saying his journey was not essential, yes it was, as I have outlined why.
A police officer issued a fine at the weekend for a shop keeper who applied chalk lines outside her shop so customers knew where to stand during social distancing, that video went viral, the fine has since been waived and police spokesperson said officers need to apply common sense approach.
My brother was stopped the other day by the police, he was just returning from doing some shopping, when they asked him why he was not at home, he told them, they were not satisfied with his answer and asked to see his shopping in his boot. Unacceptable over zealous policing.
The Police need to be very careful here because this is a temporary measure, usually we live in a State where it is policed by consent. If they start acting like the Gestapo, civil unrest will grow, as it is already doing so in Italy.
|
Where is the picture of the supplies? Why did it need both him and his wife to attend? If they only stayed long enough to sing "Happy Birthday", why did they both need to sit down for it?
They spent enough time there to put some items on the doorstep, move them out of the way, move a couple of chairs outside, and take various photos. Not an essential brief flying visit.
The evidence strongly suggests that the prime method of distribution is with
social gatherings and interactions. Where people are confined in a situation like on a cruise ship, one group will interact together then those people will interact with other groups. Similarly at a conference over several days, groups of people will get together to talk, and then go off and interact with other groups. That will be how it spreads. You have clear examples where people have gathered for things like funerals or religious gatherings and a virus has run rampant in those attending. I see little evidence of problems arising from many people going for a walk in the park, as long as they don't interact(eg talk to one another). There isn't an infectious aura surrounding people, it is more directional in nature.
In all of these examples of gatherings, how many people are infected by coughs, sneezes, surface contacts? Should be simple to examine what people did at those gatherings in order to try and understand transmission methods. Is it talking(expelling droplets of saliva) to one another, or just breathing in the vicinity?
Link
Quote:
|
Within days of the March 13 funeral, niece Susan Nelson, 65, fell ill and later died of suspected coronavirus. She had no underlying health conditions. Now, a further 16 family members have said they suspect they too caught the virus at Sheila’s funeral.
|