[Dave42]

Originally Posted by OLD BOY

How is it propaganda? Labour admitted there was no money left as they departed No 10. They spent our entire reserves on their vanity projects and handouts. You can deny it all you like, but you are fooling nobody. The only reason the Lib Dems went into coalition with the Conservatives was because they knew they had to do this in the national interest and rescue the economy.

The spending plans Labour have in their manifesto, plus the Waspi women 'compensation' package is all the evidence you need that Labour have not learned a thing. The austerity that would have to be imposed if we let these losers in would put the austerity we have already suffered well into the shade.

People are turning away from Labour in droves because they don't want a future for themselves or their children which involves queuing up for bread and going without essential medicines. Spending money on the scale proposed by Labour will have devastating outcomes for this country. You need to wake up from your Utopian dreams and smell the coffee, mate.

the propaganda is the lie austerity was a necessity when it was a very blatant political choice both main parties are disastrous I am one of the millions of poltical homeless ones in this country

---------- Post added at 13:34 ---------- Previous post was at 13:31 ----------

Originally Posted by denphone

l won't be voting Labour but l won't be voting Tory either.

l won't be defending the indefensible so l hope you won't as lets move on to good old Boris and see how much of that you think is indefensible?.

Boris Johnson called Commonwealth citizens “piccaninnies” and “watermelons” , Is that defensible?.

Boris Johnson said Britain should be “in charge” of Africa again , Is that defensible?.

Boris Johnson stated that “orientals” had “have larger brains and higher IQ scores”, while “blacks are at the other pole”. Is that defensible?.

Boris Johnson also stated that Muslim women were “bank robbers” , Is that defensible?.

Boris Johnson Johnson’s ministerial record consists of two excruciating years as foreign secretary during which he regularly embarrassed Britain with gaffes, gratuitous insults and carelessness of the sort that ensured Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe remains incarcerated in Tehran , Is that defensible?.

Boris Johnson is a serial philanderer with two broken marriages and a love child. He is profoundly untrustworthy and disloyal, as his wives and a succession of Tory leaders can testify , Not a leader just like Corbyn one can trust?.

He was fired by The Times for making up stories , Not great Prime minister material is it?.

Johnson is just as shifty as Corbyn is unacceptable as a future prime minister.

l rest my case.....

well said Den agree 100%