Quote:
Originally Posted by OLD BOY
It's not in the manifesto, it's what they've already said. They are both Marxists, remember?
This country will never embrace Communism, and that's why these two dangerous lunatics will not win the election.
In fact, the opinion polls are probably showing Labour in a better light than is justified. I would wager that many who say they will vote Labour will get cold feet and not vote at all. Most people do understand the danger that the Marx brothers pose to this country. You need to catch up, jfman, and stop defending the indefensible.
|
l won't be voting Labour but l won't be voting Tory either.
l won't be defending the indefensible so l hope you won't as lets move on to good old Boris and see how much of that you think is defensible?.
Boris Johnson called Commonwealth citizens “piccaninnies” and “watermelons” , Is that defensible?.
Boris Johnson said Britain should be “in charge” of Africa again , Is that defensible?.
Boris Johnson stated that “orientals” had “have larger brains and higher IQ scores”, while “blacks are at the other pole”. Is that defensible?.
Boris Johnson also stated that Muslim women were “bank robbers” , Is that defensible?.
Boris Johnson Johnson’s ministerial record consists of two excruciating years as foreign secretary during which he regularly embarrassed Britain with gaffes, gratuitous insults and carelessness of the sort that ensured Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe remains incarcerated in Tehran , Is that defensible?.
Boris Johnson is a serial philanderer with two broken marriages and a love child. He is profoundly untrustworthy and disloyal, as his wives and a succession of Tory leaders can testify , Not a leader just like Corbyn one can trust?.
He was fired by The Times for making up stories , Not great Prime minister material is it?.
Johnson is just as shifty as Corbyn is unacceptable as a future prime minister.
l rest my case.....