View Single Post
Old 24-11-2019, 11:24   #122
nomadking
cf.mega poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northampton
Services: Virgin Media TV&BB 350Mb, V6 STB
Posts: 8,153
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
nomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze arraynomadking has a bronze array
Re: Election 2019 - Week 3

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman View Post
The change to 66 in this decade was not notified in the 1990s so please don’t lie to the forum. That was the Pensions Act 2011.

I don’t think anyone in work would consider the having to delay their retirement plans and work longer to afford retirement as a good opportunity. Indeed, they always had that option, even when claiming the state pension.
Quote:
So under the 1995 Pensions Act a timetable was drawn up to equalise the age at which men and women could draw their state pension.
Quote:
Under the 2011 Pensions Act the new qualifying age of 65 for women was bought forward to 2018 - affecting millions of women.
By two whole years.


What plans did they have, and how does it have anything to do with possibly having looked after kids?
nomadking is offline