Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
If each was as productive in 32 hours, the starting premise of the post you quoted, as 40 there’d be no need for additional staff. Just the rota adjusted to give cover across the 168 hours of the week. With 300 staff that shouldn’t be too hard.
|
Ever heard of 4 on 4 off shift patterns, Continental shift patterns and the like?
You're saying machines could run themselves, feed themselves materials needed, fix any breakdowns themselves etc etc during the hours no workers were there.
apologies in advance, but . . "Your ignorance on these matters is frankly startling."
