Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris
On the contrary, the mode of any communication is an integral component of that communication and it is entirely fair to take it into account. A great many otherwise serious and thoughtful people have communicated frivolous, libellous, hate-filled or just plain boneheaded nonsense when presented with 280 characters, a send button and the prospect of instant adulation from thousands of “followers”.
Barristers have opinions; only those presented in court are tested, and then 50% of them are proven wrong.
|
Or...
It’s an attempt to provide evaluations based on information from an award winning legal blogger and Sunday Times best selling author who has decades of legal experience, rather than from a couple of randos with little, if any, practical formal knowledge of the law, on a forum (or an "unnamed senior source in No. 10 who has been found repeatedly to be wrong in legal matters around this subject before, as opposed to the barrister quoted).
You say "potato", I say "Marshall McLuhan"
__________________
Thank you for calling the Abyss.
If you have called to scream, please press 1 to be transferred to the Void, or press 2 to begin your stare.
If my post is in bold and this colour, it's a Moderator Request.
Last edited by Hugh; 05-10-2019 at 21:43.
|