Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre
Of course he will, that’s the law.
He may well “seek” it, if he get’s one. We’ll see if he decides to use it.
|
How can something that specifies, if Parliament doesn't agree or the EU Parliament doesn't agree, then X has to be done, be legal? Parliament won't specify what they would agree to, and the EU Parliament have only said what they would agree to. How can a 3rd party(ie Boris) be held responsible or accountable for any of that?
Anyway you look at it, that limb of the legislation can only be reached if any proposals have been put to
both Parliaments. The "question" hasn't been asked, never mind answered.
Another aspect of this ILLEGAL law(eg rushed through and has debating time limits specified) is that the "no to no deal" means both Leave and Remain. Some of Leave side voted for it to have a TEMPORARY TRANSITIONAL deal, but the Remain side are using it to FORCE A COUP of never ending delays to leaving. How would the logic of that "law" be legal in any other context? Imagine if it was used for a Benefits related law, and it was something any claimant could never ever achieve. Imagine if the Scots voted for independence, and these tactics were used.