Quote:
Originally Posted by jfman
A customer who buys an advertised product, with UHD, who hooks it up and finds their ISP isn’t offering consistently high enough speeds isn’t going to be happy at effectively being missold a product. They might cancel, then Sky have associated costs to set it up and no customer through no fault of their own.
If Sky have aspirations to launch two or three UHD channels then again that’s more pressure if people are wanting to record multiple streams.
It’s easier to just admit it’s a second tier product from outset and wait for internet infrastructure to catch up. I’d be interested to know if the hardware is UHD capable. By getting hardware out there they could run real world trials.
|
How could they be missold a product when they were told the minimum requirement? Yet again you are being argumentative just for the sake of it.