View Single Post
Old 27-09-2019, 16:18   #608
mrmistoffelees
067
 
mrmistoffelees's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Middlesbrough
Age: 49
Services: Many
Posts: 5,034
mrmistoffelees has a nice shiny star
mrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny starmrmistoffelees has a nice shiny star
Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth View Post
Boris did nothing illegal. He acted unlawfully which is quite different. Acting illegally is obviously unlawful. Acting unlawfully in the context of the SC ruling means acting against the public interest or social convention; no statute was breached.

'What law did Boris Johnson break?
Boris Johnson's prorogation did break the law, but it broke constitutional, not criminal law.

By preventing Parliament's right to hold the government to account, he broke the rules governing how the UK functions.

What he did was "unlawful" - meaning it wasn't permitted or conforming to the law. But it is not "illegal" - which would mean forbidden by law.'

From the Brexiteer red top....

At no point did i say he had done something illegal....
__________________
Nerves of steel, heart of gold, knob of butter......

Last edited by mrmistoffelees; 27-09-2019 at 16:22.
mrmistoffelees is offline